Curtis Solomon v. United States

Curtis Solomon v. United States, 911 F.3d 1356 (January 8, 2019) The Court affirmed the denial of a defendant’s second § 2255 motion which alleged that the defendant’s conviction under the residual clause of § 924(c) was unconstitutional. The Court held that the defendant’s motion was not based on a “new rule of constitutional law”…

Read Full Article

In re: Tracy Garrett

In re: Tracy Garrett, No. 18-13680-F, (November 2, 2018) The Court held that an application to file a successive motion under § 2255, brought by a defendant convicted under § 924(c) and based on Johnson and Dimaya, was not based on a “new rule of constitutional law,” since the Eleventh Circuit held en banc in…

Read Full Article

James Manuel Phillips, Jr. v. Warden

James Manuel Phillips, Jr. v. Warden, No. 14-11910, (October 31, 2018) The Court affirmed the district court’s order dismissing the petitioner’s § 2254 motion as time-barred, since the statute of limitations began running when the petitioner missed the deadline for appealing his conviction to the highest court in the state of conviction, and not after…

Read Full Article

Robert Randolph v. United States

Robert Randolph v. United States, No. 17-10620 (September 25, 2018) The Court affirmed the district court’s denial of the defendant’s § 2255 motion, holding that the defendant’s Johnson claim was not a “new rule of constitutional law that was previously unavailable” since the defendant included a Johnson claim in his first § 2255, which were…

Read Full Article
Our Blog